Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Layton v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00139
Petitioner: David Matthew Layton
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Layton v. Sims We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00104
Plaintiff: David Matthew Layton
Defendant: Randall C Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05018
Petitioner: Brian David Matthews
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Kurtzemann v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-20804
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID MATTHEW KURTZEMANN
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
McDonald v. Forcum et al
as 5:2009cv00226
Plaintiff: Cecil R McDonald
Defendant: Richard W Forcum and David Matthew Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockman v. Underwood et al
as 5:2009cv00193
Plaintiff: Kevin Lee Cockman
Defendant: Brad Underwood and David Matthew Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockman v. Underwood et al
as 7:2009cv00093
Petitioner: Kevin Lee Cockman
Respondent: Brad Underwood and David Matthew Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2009cv01614
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: State of Georgia, Donna Matthews and Daimontae S. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Warden
as 1:2009cv01223
Petitioner: David Matthews
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2009cv01104
Plaintiff: David Matthews
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?