Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Hester v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Cornell Hester
Defendant:
David Pierce, Raney Roger, Lieutenant Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Orin Turner v. Robert Coupe, et al
as 16-1273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORIN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER ROBERT COUPE, WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, DEPUTY WARDEN PARKS and others
Daum v. Racette et al
as 9:2015cv01083
Plaintiff:
Terry Daum
Defendant:
Steven Racette, Steven Brown, Delvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Robinson v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 15-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY F. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, LT. TRADER, LT. MARK D. DAUM and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, MAJOR SCAROBOROUGH, STAFF LT. KAREN HAWKINS and others
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Nathaniel Jackson v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 13-4468
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATHANIEL L. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellant:
PERRY PHELPS, MICHAEL TRADER, STEVEN FLOYD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE MARTIN
Humble v. Harness et al
as 4:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Humble
Defendant:
Ron Harness, Denny Manning, Randy Kichner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daum v. LaValley
as 1:2013cv03730
Petitioner:
Terry Daum
Respondent:
Thomas LaValley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Daum v. John Doe et al
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Terry Daum
Defendant:
Sergeant John Doe, Correction Officer Zehla, Correction Officer Holtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
