Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Demetrius Bailey, et al v. Gagnon, et al
as 09-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT DRAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
GAGNON, NEIL, CRAMER and others
Bailey v. Wakefield
as 3:2009cv00317
Petitioner:
Demetrius Bailey
Respondent:
David Wakefield and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SPADY et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01599
Plaintiff:
DEVIN X. SPADY, JOSEPH LAURENSAU, EVOL YOUNG and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN D. SCHAFFER, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOWARD et al v. JONES et al
as 1:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
MORRIS HOWARD, SHAWN BROWN, JOSEPH MCGOLGON and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAYMOND SOBINA, BARONE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demetrius Bailey v. Durant, et al
as 08-4136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DURANT, Captain, LARADY, Captain, SHERRIFF and others
BAILEY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2008cv01115
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Trustee:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demetrius Bailey v. David Wakefield, et al
as 08-3124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
DAVID WAKEFIELD, DA ALGHNY and ATTY GEN PA
BAILEY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, DIANE THOMAS, DANIEL DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Bailey v. Derral Adams
as 08-15996
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Demetrius Bailey, et al v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-1768
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EVAN KEELING, VICTOR BROWN, JOSEPH B.X. SAMPLE and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, DONALD VAUGHN, ROBERT SHANNON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
