Cases 41 - 50 of 77
RICHARDS v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv02457
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02201
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, JOHN LAYON, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERHILL v. KARDIS et al
as 1:2019cv04410
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, EMILY KARDIS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY UNDERHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Gelipeau et al
as 3:2019cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Small
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Gelipeau, John Doe 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUBBARD v. COUNTY OF MARION et al
as 1:2019cv03063
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BYRON HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lampkins v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lampkins
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, John Doe #2 and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodd v. Wexford Medical Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Inc, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Richard Dodd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOTKINS v. SAYLOR et al
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
SHAW, DAVIS, SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ARTHUR BOTKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUCE v. DOE et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN DOE #1
Plaintiff:
JASON KENNETH BRUCE
Interested Party:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00985
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Department of Corrections and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Jason Kenneth Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
