Cases 41 - 50 of 66
CODY v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
CONTRELL DEANDRE CODY
Defendant:
MITCH DANIELS, RON NEAL and ERIC HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL and JOSEPH DUWAYNE TUNSTILL
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, RICHARD HAGENMAIEER, T. PHEGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOCKBEE v. DUGAN et al
as 2:2020cv00536
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOHN DOE, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ANTHONY MOCKBEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2020cv00599
Plaintiff:
Anastaisa Renee and Elmer D Charles, Jr
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, Jr, Ron Neal and Eric Holcomb
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv01673
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. WATKINS
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., STANLEY KNIGHT, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOTEP-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01567
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOE HOGSETT, DAVID ZIEMBA and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2020cv00563
Defendant:
DOUG HUYVAERT, DREW ADAMS, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA E. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sample v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 2:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Mr. Bodlovich, Indiana State Prison, Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis F Sample, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2019cv00411
Defendant:
Commissioner, Indiana General Assembly, Jeff Siegel and others
Plaintiff:
Elmer Lee Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Sevier et al
as 3:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Greg Sheward, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Captain Earhardt and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
