Cases 41 - 50 of 51
LOCKHART v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2014cv00106
Defendant:
BEDFORD, BOYER, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY SHAWN LOCKHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Holmes v. Fort Wayne Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv00642
Plaintiff:
Quintin Holmes
Defendant:
Fort Wayne Police Department, Thomas Strausberger, David Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00437
Petitioner:
Quintin Holmes
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Superintendent, Miami Correctional Facility
as 4:2013cv00023
Petitioner:
Quinton D Holmes
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Widdup et al
as 3:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Donald Holmes
Defendant:
Sheriff Widdup, Officer Name Unknown, Ms House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00261
Defendant:
DEBBIE BURTON, DEBBIE BURTON, ROBERT ERWIN and others
Plaintiff:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Granger v. Webb et al
as 1:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
Christopher Granger
Defendant:
Jeremy Webb, Chris Hoffman, Justin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PIGGIE v. APPLEGATE et al
as 3:2008cv00115
Plaintiff:
CLYDE PIGGIE
Defendant:
TOM APPLEGATE, LISA LANNSON, KIM GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRANNING v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2008cv00846
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GRANNING
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, MARY MANSFIELD, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granning v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
Kevin Granning
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Mary Mansfield, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
