Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Hamilton v. South Carolina Dept of Correction et al
as 5:2013cv02506
Petitioner:
Thomas Curtis Hamilton
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Correction and William Byars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Hampton County Sheriff Department
as 9:2013cv01929
Plaintiff:
Brian McDonald Hamilton
Defendant:
Hampton County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall v. Leapord et al
as 2:2013cv01259
Plaintiff:
Terry Edward McCall
Defendant:
Christy Leapord, Officer Sewwell, Tammy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00811
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamilton v. USA
as 8:2013cv00790
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jesse J Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ferrell v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00498
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ferrell
Defendant:
John Hamilton Smith, Norman E Fogle and Thomas O MacGregor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Young v. Griffin et al
as 1:2012cv03009
Plaintiff:
Rodney David Young
Defendant:
Christopher Griffin, Tammy Hamilton and Mary Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crouchman v. Pickens County LEC Jail et al
as 9:2012cv02231
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey William Crouchman
Defendant:
Pickens County LEC Jail, Keith Galloway, Drew Sisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 9:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Dennis Tyrone Hamilton
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Charleston, County of and Al Canon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
