Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Cockerham v. Willis
as 3:2015cv00382
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Respondent:
Warden J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. J.S. WILLIS et al
as 3:2015cv00368
Respondent:
FSL La Tuna-FBOP, WARDEN J.S. WILLIS, Madam Loretta Lynch and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glover v. J.S. WILLIS
as 3:2015cv00320
Petitioner:
Alex Sonni Glover, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN J.S. WILLIS
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moon v. Rivas et al
as 3:2015cv00890
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
Henry Rivas, M. Neumann, Steven Cardona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. Rivas, et al
as 3:2015cv00891
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
Henry Rivas, M. Neumann, Steven Cardona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. Walton et al
as 3:2015cv00889
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
J.S. Walton, Henry Rivas, M. Neumann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. Willis
as 3:2015cv00198
Petitioner:
Fidel Jesus Hernandez
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Springer v. Willis
as 3:2015cv00191
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Lindsey Kent Springer
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Picardi v. United States of America
as 5:2015cv05050
Plaintiff:
Edward J.S. Picardi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv11769
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant:
J.S. Walton, Potts, B. Brown and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
