Cases 41 - 50 of 134
Murphy v. Wills et al
as 3:2021cv01453
Plaintiff:
Steven Murphy
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, John/Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Benzing et al
as 3:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
Antwon D. Jenkins
Defendant:
Kenny Benzing, John/Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson v. Dorethy et al
as 3:2021cv01441
Plaintiff:
Ricky Patterson
Defendant:
Warden Stephanie Dorethy, C. J. McLaughlin, Lieutenant Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Pfister, Amy Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2021cv00567
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regan v. Wills et al
as 3:2021cv00477
Defendant:
William A. Spiller, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Jeff Mulholland and others
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jr et al v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2021cv02807
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, Cermak Health Services, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lorenzo Dwayne Thomas Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al
as 3:2021cv00440
Defendant:
Ms Smith, Jane Doe #8, Penny George and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03086
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
