Cases 41 - 50 of 237
TORRES v. SLAUGHTER et al
as 2:2020cv07218
Plaintiff:
LUIS A. TORRES
Defendant:
SERGEANT MOUNTCASTLE-THOMAS, ADMINISTRATOR JAMES SLAUGHTER, OFFICER BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05101
Petitioner:
KELVIN JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv02945
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner:
CURTIS JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LLOYD-JONES v. SOLOIMAN et al
as 2:2020cv00912
Defendant:
DR. JOSE A. TORRESS, DR. JEFFREY POMERANTZ, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU and others
Plaintiff:
TOMAS LLOYD-JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIGBEKAEN v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv22115
Respondent:
MS. RIVERA, AW SMITH, SOLICITOR GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES V. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv21630
Defendant:
DETECTIVE THOMAS RICE, SHERRIFF K9 OFFICER SHANNON SWEENEY, OFFICER KENNETH MCGARRY and others
Plaintiff:
RICCO N. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv21629
Defendant:
MATTHEW MURPHY, MATTHEW KATZENBACH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
JONES N. RICCO and RICCO N. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv20123
Petitioner:
QUAWEE JONES
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
IVESTER v. SWEENY et al
as 3:2019cv16559
Defendant:
GREG ORT, JOHN DOE WARDEN, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL INVESTER and MICHAEL IVESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARNS v. LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS AND MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE et al
as 2:2019cv13353
Defendant:
ESQ. ALBERT CERNADAS, JR., LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS AND MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE, STUART PEIM, J.S.C and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIL L. HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
