Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Eddie Martin, Jr. v. Dawn Grounds, et al
as 09-51064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE W. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAWN E. GROUNDS, Warden, KENNETH DEAN, J. HUGHES, Correction Officer IV and others
Barksdale v. Cermeno et al
as 5:2009cv05028
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Barksdale
Defendant:
J. Cermeno , D. Johnston and SVSP-CDCR Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barksdale v. Cermeno et al
as 4:2009cv05028
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Barksdale
Defendant:
J. Cermeno, D. Johnston and SVSP-CDCR Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Grounds et al
as 6:2009cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eddie W. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Dawn E. Grounds, Kenneth Dean, J. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. U.S. Constitution et al
as 2:2009cv02132
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Defendant:
U.S. Constitution, U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2009cv00891
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Barack Hussein Obama, Mike Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Avenal State Prison et al
as 1:2009cv00358
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Respondent:
Avenal State Prison and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Boone v. Grounds et al
as 6:2008cv00271
Plaintiff:
Morris D. Boone
Defendant:
Dawn Grounds, Kenneth Dean and FNU Garza
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reese v. Grounds, et al
as 08-50951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMINEL REESE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAWN GROUNDS, STEPHEN FULLMAN, LARRY FEMRITE and others
Reese v. Dean et al
as 6:2008cv00221
Plaintiff:
Norminel Reese, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth Dean, Exiqio Garza, Alton Caskey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
