Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Glenn O'Neal v. Jennifer Reovan, et al
as 13-55523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN DAVID O'NEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER REOVAN, TIM GUHIN, Attorney, Attorney At Law, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT and others
Whitaker v. Daley, et al.
as 2:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Joseph Whitaker
Defendant:
Daley, Burnett, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn David O'Neal v. Jennifer Reovan et al
as 5:2013cv00176
Defendant:
Deanna Avey-Motikeit, Cathy Cimbalo, Candice Dugan and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn David O'Neal
Richardson #361621 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2012cv00435
Plaintiff:
Larry Richardson #361621
Defendant:
Catherine Bauman, Jacquline Nadeau, D. P. Mansfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Centric et al
as 3:2012cv00401
Defendant:
Dr. Centric, Sgt. Chubert, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatlen v. Cox et al
as 3:2012cv00384
Defendant:
Afeaki, Scott Alexander, Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Jordan v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 12-1891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, Director of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER CHRYSLER, Michigan Department of Corrections Employee, SCOTT SCHOOLEY, Michigan Department of Corrections Employee and others
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, C. Deatsman, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, Unknown Briggs, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv12044
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
T Lindemuth, C Deatsman, Catherine S Bauman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
