Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Garcia v. Madden
as 3:2015cv00652
Petitioner:
Elenar L. Garcia
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Attorney General of the State of California
as 3:2015cv00385
Petitioner:
Elenar L. Garcia
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARCIA v. GILMORE et al
as 1:2015cv00024
Petitioner:
Alexander L. Garcia
Respondent:
Robert D. Gilmore , Kathleen Kane , The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miguel Garcia v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 14-15818
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL L. GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
GARCIA v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2014cv06416
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER L. GARCIA
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE, KATHLEEN KANE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv00843
Plaintiff:
Juan L. Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Daniels v. Monroe/Lienberger Detention Centers et al
as 2:2014cv02176
Plaintiff:
Landry Daniels
Defendant:
Monroe/Lienberger Detention Centers, City of Woodland, Miguel Castaneda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angel Garcia v. District Attorney Dauphin Coun, et al
as 14-1395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL L. GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI
Angel Louis Vega, Jr. v. M. Nunez et al
as 2:2013cv09530
Defendant:
L. Garcia and M. Nunez
Plaintiff:
Angel L Vega, Jr
Garcia v. Disctrict Attorney of Dauphin County et al
as 3:2013cv01857
Petitioner:
Angel L. Garcia
Respondent:
Disctrict Attorney of Dauphin County and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
