Cases 41 - 50 of 5,927
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2021cv01258
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Jones and Kevin Jones
Respondent:
J Rodriguez, Lorie Davis, R Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 20-10013
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY VILLANUEVA, Captain, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, GARTH PARKER, Warden, LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDGAR HERNANDEZ
Opry v. Lumpkin
as 20-10804
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jim Harvey Opry
Respondent / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Woolverton v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2021cv00138
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Lawrence Dean Woolverton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nesmith v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Respondent:
Dr. Henderson, University of Texas Medical Branch, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Nesmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Davis et al
as 9:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Lieutenant Matthew S. Steel, Edward B. Sells and Executive Director Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Davis et al
as 6:2021cv00147
Defendant:
John Doe, Unknown Party, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 7:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Warden FNU Lasada, Officer John Doe 4 721cv33, Officer John Doe 3 721cv33 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2021cv00373
Petitioner:
Joseph Martinez
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burley v. Davis et al
as 6:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
Eldrick Burley
Defendant:
Director, UTMB, Pam Pace, Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
