Cases 41 - 50 of 1,167
Garey v. Hughes et al
as 5:2023ct03361
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Garey
Defendant:
Chip Hughes, Chad Smith and Lt. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Federal Prisons Director of B.O.P. et al
as 5:2023ct03325
Plaintiff:
Anin M. Keith and Anin Michael Keith
Defendant:
Federal Prisons Director of B.O.P., Collette Peters, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McBride v. USA
as 5:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lee McBride
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Floyde et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Williams
Defendant:
Elizabeth Floyde, Joseph Crosswhite, Sam Winthrop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Commonwealth Attorney
as 5:2023ct03335
Plaintiff:
George Lee Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. USA
as 1:2023cv01074
Petitioner:
TONY LEE THOMPSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Marsh v. Head of Prison et al
as 5:2023ct03289
Plaintiff:
Everette Lee Marsh
Defendant:
Head of Prison and Tabor Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strother v. Lenoir County Sheriff Office, et al.
as 5:2023ct03320
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Strothers and Robert Lee Strother
Defendant:
Lenoir County Sheriff Office and Lenoir County Emergency Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00966
Petitioner:
RANDY LEE EVANS, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hall et al v. Head of Prison et al
as 5:2023ct03268
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall and Everette Lee Marsh
Defendant:
Head of Prison, Tabor Correctional Institution, Sgt Truner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
