Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Darnell v. Faris et al
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Darnell
Defendant:
James Faris, Mark Mcgairty, Lindsay Clemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Arledge et al
as 1:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Brent Everrett Ryan
Defendant:
Mike Arledge, Mark Miley, Rick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freddie Webber, Jr. v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 16-60474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE L. WEBBER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and LOWNDES COUNTY
ROGERS v. LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 7:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
JOHN ADAM ROGERS
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MATTHEW BANNISTER, RANDY LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry Darnell v. Lee Howard, IV, et al
as 16-60315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEE DARNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE HOWARD, IV, Circuit Court Judge, FORREST ALLGOOD, District Attorney, MARK JACKSON, Assistant District Attorney and others
Charles Hawkins v. Chris Prine, et al
as 16-10557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JEREL HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS PRINE, LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and JOHN REED, Correctional Officer, Lowndes County Jail
Grady v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00015
Petitioner:
Christopher Grady
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Donna S. Smith, Lindsay Climons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Webber v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Webber, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Lowndes County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. PRINE et al
as 7:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEREL HAWKINS
Defendant:
CHRIS PRINE, LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and JOHN REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell v. Stanford et al
as 1:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Darnell
Defendant:
Barry Stanford, Sara Rickit, Richard T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
