Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Charles Lusk v. Carlisietta Warner, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-20552
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES EDWARD LUSK
Defendant - Appellee: CARLISIETTA R. WARNER, Sergeant, O.B. Ellis I Unit and ALICIA SCOTT, Property Officer, O.B. Ellis I Unit
Carl Lusk v. Michael Cole, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2547
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARL D. LUSK
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL COLE, Sergeant, SHANE GARLAND, JENNIFER GILBERTSON and others
Lusk v. Rhode
as 2:2018cv00975
Plaintiff: Carl D Lusk
Defendant: CO Rhode
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sagesse v. Bastedo et al
as 2:2018cv00225
Plaintiff: Rones Sagesse
Defendant: Jeffrey J. Bastedo, Joseph M. Clark, Gregory Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Strong et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00953
Plaintiff: Marcus Jones
Defendant: Kelly Strong, Loaiza Todd, Shalester Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lusk v. Warner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00831
Petitioner: Charles E. Lusk
Defendant: Carlisietta R. Warner and Alicia Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lusk v. Jablonski We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00105
Plaintiff: Ronald Lusk
Defendant: David Jablonski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Soucie et al
as 1:2017cv03093
Plaintiff: Calvin Johnson
Defendant: Soucie, Glissman, Wingert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lusk v. Lutsey et al
as 2:2017cv00833
Plaintiff: Carl D Lusk
Defendant: Lutsey and Al DeGroot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Lusk v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-40626
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES EDWARD LUSK
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?