Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Rufus v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv03581
Petitioner:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Rufus v. Ralph Kemp
as 13-14148
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent - Appellee:
RALPH KEMP
Rufus v. Kemp
as 3:2013cv00064
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent:
RALPH KEMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Rufus v. Social Security
as 13-6839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY, City of Camden, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Rufus v. Kemp
as 4:2013cv00058
Petitioner:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Rufus v. State of Georgia, et al
as 12-16606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, SAMUEL D. OZBURN, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE OF THE ALCOVY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and others
Rufus v Social Security et al
as 3:2012cv03370
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant:
Social Security, Social Security Administration, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rufus v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv03869
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Samuel D. Ozburn, Public Defender Office of the Alcovy Judicial Circuit and others
Michael Rufus v. Warden, Jenkins CC, et al
as 12-15453
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH CHAPMAN, Warden, Jenkins Correctional Center and STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
