Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Jones v. Hurt et al
as 5:2016ct03040
Plaintiff: Chris A. Jones
Defendant: Ms. Hunt, Mr. McKoy, Ms. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hurt et al
as 5:2016ct03017
Plaintiff: Chris A. Jones
Defendant: Correctional Officer Hurt, Mr. McKoy, Captain Southhall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 5:2015ct03321
Plaintiff: Carlos Avalos
Defendant: City of Chicago, Illinois, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harry D. Leinenweber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neal v. McNeil et al
as 5:2015ct03284
Plaintiff: Tori Jarel Neal
Defendant: C/O McNeil, C/O Murphy, C. Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOINER v. MCSWAIN et al
as 1:2015cv00881
Plaintiff: RAYMOND JOINER
Defendant: DEBORAH L. MCSWAIN, BRIAN MURPHY and KATY POOLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patten et al v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2015ct03118
Plaintiff: Thomas Patten , Leslie Teachey , Ryan Turner and others
Defendant: Frank L. Perry, Lafayette Hall, Jeffrey Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOINER v. POOLE et al
as 1:2015cv00248
Plaintiff: RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant: KATY POOLE, MURPHY and ALICE MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Craven County Municipality et al
as 5:2015ct03007
Plaintiff: Robert Murphy
Defendant: Craven County Municipality, Lee W. Bettis, Jr., Judge Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 5:2015ct03003
Plaintiff: Keith Henderson
Defendant: James E. Graham, Stephen J. Murphy, III, A. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Macon County Municipality We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00054
Plaintiff: Edward Murphy
Defendant: Macon County Municipality
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?