Cases 41 - 50 of 292
CHAMBERS v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01774
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. CHAMBERS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYD v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01764
Petitioner:
JAMES D. BOYD
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. GEO GROUP, INC et al
as 1:2022cv01728
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MOORE
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC, MARK SEVIER, G. CECIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. FRENCH et al
as 1:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY LONG
Defendant:
JENNIFER FRENCH, MARK SEVIER, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
John Galipeau, Mark Sevier, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROCK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2022cv01698
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SCHROCK and MATTHEW ALAN SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, GEO GROUP, INC., ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELEZ v. I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
ANGELO VELEZ, JR.
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, ROBERT E. CARTER, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKARD v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. AKARD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01528
Petitioner:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLATO v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv01483
Petitioner:
ROBERT J. PLATO, JR.
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
