Cases 41 - 50 of 146
HUTCHISON v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv02442
Defendant:
MOORE, DAVIS, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK D.L.S. HUTCHISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv01916
Defendant:
THOMPSON, FRIENCH, CDL PROGRAM and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LOUIS WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ et al v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv01700
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. VASQUEZ
Defendant:
R. FOUST, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWANN v. SEVIER et al
as 2:2020cv00320
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, ASSISTANT WARDEN OF OPERATIONS FOR NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and DAVIS
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARLAND v. GEO GROUP: NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2020cv01540
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GARLAND
Defendant:
GEO GROUP: NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. WSBT 22 News Station et al
as 3:2020cv00424
Defendant:
WSBT 22 News Station, St Joseph County Sheriffs Office, Mishawaka Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. PRULHIERE et al
as 1:2020cv01282
Defendant:
PAUL PRULHIERE, C. ROLLAND, VANDERHILL and others
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE TAYLOR, JUSTIN LEE TAYLOR and Jason Lee Taylor IDOC Number
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2020cv00713
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv00626
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and GEO GROUP
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NEW CASTLE PRISON FACILITY et al
as 1:2020cv00448
Defendant:
TYLER BERKIRK and NEW CASTLE PRISON FACILITY
Plaintiff:
RALPH EUGENE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
