Cases 41 - 50 of 431
(PC) Thomas v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Prentice Ray Thomas
Defendant:
B. Weaver, Justin Garcia, Adriana Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tommy Ponce, Jr. v. M. Solorio, et al
as 22-16758
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY GABRIEL PONCE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SOLORIO, Correctional Counselor I at CSATF, I. RUIZ, Trust Department Employee at CSATF, B. EDWARDS, Chief Executive Officer at CSATF and others
Mendez v. Copeland et al
as 5:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Mendez
Defendant:
Havlan Copeland, Ralph Lopez, Beto Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponce-Ulloa v. USA
as 1:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
Jose Oribel Ponce-Ulloa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Efrain Diaz Ponce v. Merrick B. Garland
as 5:2022cv01751
Petitioner:
Efrain Diaz Ponce
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schlomo Schmuel v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2022cv07005
Petitioner:
Schlomo Schmuel
Respondent:
Felicia Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sheffield v. Ponce
as 1:2022cv23311
Plaintiff:
Andre Sheffield
Defendant:
B. Ponce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Ponce
as 3:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Andre Sheffield
Defendant:
B. Ponce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Douglas Abel v. Western Regional Office Director et al
as 2:2022cv06155
Plaintiff:
Gary Douglas Abel
Defendant:
Western Regional Office Director, Felicia Ponce, Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlomo Schmuel v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2022mc00186
Petitioner:
SCHLOMO SCHMUEL and Felicia Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
