Cases 41 - 50 of 445
Havens v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2019cv00870
Defendant:
N.P. R. King, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Ronald King and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Roger Wayne Havens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. King et al
as 4:2019cv00161
Petitioner:
Elbert Davis
Respondent:
Attorney General Jim Hood and Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. King et al
as 3:2019cv00722
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Brazier, Ronald King, Unknown Fillaw and others
Plaintiff:
Wayland Leonard Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Brooks et al
as 3:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Latasha Brooks, Dean Epps, Sheila Parks and others
Plaintiff:
Tedra Crawford
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCune v. King
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
Superintendent Ronald King
Plaintiff:
Christopher O'Neil McCune
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. King et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Ronald King
Petitioner:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lyons v. King
as 3:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Ronald King
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lyons
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. King et al
as 3:2019cv00189
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Davis, Sgt. Unknown Bailor, Warden Unknown Banks and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edwards Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamage v. CO-11 Jenkins et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Brian Ladner, CO-11 Jenkins, Latisha Brooks and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gamage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00771
Petitioner:
Kendrick Marques Bell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, James Fillyaw and Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
