Cases 41 - 50 of 69
SIMMONS v. ATKINSON et al
as 1:2013cv01152
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. ATKINSON et al
as 1:2013cv01117
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01051
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON, RANDALL SHELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01031
Plaintiff:
JACOB LEE WHITE
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01030
Plaintiff:
JACOB LEE WHITE
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CEASAR v. VELL et al
as 1:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
VICTOR C. CEASAR
Defendant:
VELL, JONES, CREED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv00995
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. USA
as 1:2013cv00751
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOSEPH KENNARD SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
