Cases 41 - 50 of 1,029
Smith v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02095
Petitioner:
Belgian Serjo Smith
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GAUSE v. GEOFF et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
WALTER T. GAUSE
Defendant:
GREGORY GEOFF, FNU - SHAW, MORRISON LEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Goodsum et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Goodsum, FNU Price, Doug Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
JABRELL CRAIG SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lentz v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023ct03078
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
Travon Campbell, Aisha Cherry, Hunter Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03077
Plaintiff:
Clevis M. Morrison
Defendant:
Domanick D. Smith, Raven Barnes, Officer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUGHENBAUGH v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Respondent:
ADAM SMITH and TA'KAIYA GAINEY-LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumgardner-Lockamy v. Logan et al
as 1:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bumgardner-Lockamy
Defendant:
M Logan, FNU Smith and M. Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Smith
as 5:2023hc02046
Petitioner:
Lance Whitaker
Respondent:
Donna M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
