Cases 41 - 50 of 485
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv00540
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv01296
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Stinson
as 3:2018cv01488
Plaintiff:
Morris Demond Schofield
Defendant:
Chris Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McGrone v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00395
Plaintiff:
Frankln Delano McGrone
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Bobby Peacock, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Deville et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Plaintiff:
Morris Demond Schofield
Defendant:
Keith Deville and A Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crippen v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01181
Plaintiff:
Eddie Crippen
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, David Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Bradfield v. Grady Perry, et al
as 17-5450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE BRADFIELD, aka Paul Farnsworth
Defendant - Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden, L. BROWN, grievance chairperson, SANDRA GATES and others
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 17-5396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON COUNTY, MOUNTAIN CITY TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Nesci v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00126
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Jane Caren and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Lloyd Nesci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
