Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Mendoza v. Schneider et al
as 4:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
Kevin Schneider, Dale F Peterson, Well Path Medical Service and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Bieden Administration et al
as 4:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Bieden Administration and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Black Hawk County Jail et al
as 6:2021cv02023
Defendant:
David Staudt, Black Hawk County Jail, Stephen Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Euniceshia Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02022
Petitioner:
Darryl Fonte Jackson
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service and Adam Spray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Back v. Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv02015
Defendant:
Department of Human Services and Christine Weber
Petitioner:
Jennifer Back
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sue Back
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plasa v. Spray et al
as 6:2021cv02025
Defendant:
Adam Spray and United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Plasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tully v. Iowa Department of Human Services
as 4:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Brian K Tully and Brian K. Tully
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sykes v. Iowa Department of Human Services, Child Support Recovery Unit
as 1:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Human Services, Child Support Recovery Unit
Plaintiff:
Kim Lee Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McArthur v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2019cv00084
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony McArthur, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Robert Stanton, U.S. Probation Office, Michael John Daly and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
