Cases 41 - 50 of 3,410
Drake v. USA
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Jalen S Drake
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
REDWINE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. REDWINE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Adam Henry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilburn v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrell Wilburn and Anthony T Wilburn
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, Ron Neal, David Liebel and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Defendant:
Indiana State of and Indiana Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lairson v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Eric Lairson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
JALEN DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brazier v. USA
as 3:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Kevin L Brazier
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
