Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Eveland v. Columbia County Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00794
Plaintiff:
Austin Mark Eveland
Defendant:
Columbia County Prison and David Varano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv05788
Plaintiff:
NELSON G. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, JOE KORSZNIAK, WEINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI-HUNTINGDON
as 2:2017cv04185
Petitioner:
HASSAN AUSTIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI-HUNTINGDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZAMICHIELI v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
LAMONT ZAMICHIELI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, NATALIE D. AUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, CARL KELDIE, VALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
AUSTIN v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2017cv00981
Petitioner:
SHAUN PATRICK AUSTIN
Respondent:
FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LINDSEY v. MCKEAN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
BARRY DANIEL LINDSEY
Defendant:
MCKEAN COUNTY JAIL, DAVID STAHLMAN, RICKY AUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. AUSTIN et al
as 2:2016cv02993
Plaintiff:
GEORGE AUSTIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AUSTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00124
Petitioner:
ANDREY DIMITRI AUSTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AUSTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv04922
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RANDALL AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
