Cases 41 - 50 of 178
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Warren v. Wells Fargo
as 4:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Byron J Warren
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Navy Federal, FWPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03005
Petitioner:
Robert Wells, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wells v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00350
Petitioner:
Robert Wells, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Lubbock County et al
as 5:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Terrance King
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Well Path Medical Services, Sgt. Tracy Marie Sasin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00893
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Woodson v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Woodson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Five Star Food Service, Well Path Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Althouse v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Althouse and Kevin R Althouse
Defendant:
United States of America, The State of Texas, The County of Dallas Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv01384
Petitioner:
Amos Wells
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Respondent:
FNU Dobbs, Well Path Medical Corp. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
