Cases 41 - 50 of 513
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Hampton v. Alkire et al
as 2:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Gary G. Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Alkire, Carrillo, Spearman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00990
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Carrillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bailey v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
Ben Gutierrez, Sonya Carrillo, Peret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Steward v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Donny Steward
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, S. Swain, D. Rohrdanz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francisco Carrillo v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15797
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO NUNEZ CARRILLO
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
(PC) Rood v. Secretary et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Colton James Rood
Defendant:
Secretary, E. Carrillo, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rood v. Secretary et al
as 1:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Colton James Rood
Defendant:
Secretary, E. Carrillo, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Eugene Hunter v. Richard Acosta et al
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hunter
Defendant:
Richard Acosta, Mike Nelson, Jamie Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Roesler
as 22-40214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Carrillo
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Roesler, Warden, Darin W. Marcinkevicius, Lieutenant, Virgil G. McMullen, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
