Cases 41 - 50 of 335
Floyd et al v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03203
Plaintiff:
Tanis Floyd and Robert H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03199
Plaintiff:
Howard H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fluid v. USA
as 3:2022cv00243
Petitioner:
Salatheo H. Fluid
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shreve v. Stephenson et al
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve
Defendant:
B M Stephenson, B. Jones, Officer Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Redd v. Dever et al
as 5:2022ct03128
Plaintiff:
Noel Kenyon Redd
Defendant:
James Dever, III, Timothy Severo, Dr. Raymond Dominici and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WATSON v. STEIN et al
as 1:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, ERIK A. HOOKS, KENNETH LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
ERIK A. HOOKS, JOSHUA H. STEIN, KENNETH LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NC Department of Public Safety
as 5:2022ct03085
Plaintiff:
Romie H. Williams
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety and Roanoke River
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LANCE, ET AL
as 1:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
DR. EDWARD LANCE and SGT. H. ARMENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
