Cases 41 - 50 of 90
USA v. William Mahan
as 12-35635
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHN MAHAN
William James v. Randy Ground
as 12-55983
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHN JAMES
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
William John Daughtery v. A Roberts et al
as 5:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
William John Daughtery
Defendant:
Does, Valarie Loureiro and A Roberts
Henry v. Ferriter et al
as 6:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
William John Henry
Defendant:
Mike Ferriter, Leroy Kirkegard, Todd Boise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrell v. State Of Nevada et al
as 3:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
William John Farrell
Defendant:
Nevada, State Of and Sparks, City Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William John James v. Randy Grounds
as 5:2011cv01589
Respondent:
Randy Grounds
Petitioner:
William John James
Mahan v. USA
as 6:2011cv70023
Petitioner:
William John Mahan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
William Daughtery v. Dennis Wilson, et al
as 11-56623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHN DAUGHTERY
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS WILSON, San Diego Police Officer, ESMERALDA TAGABAN, San Diego Police Officer, GRIFFIN, Sergeant, San Diego Police Department and others
HUDGINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv05187
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHN HUDGINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
William Daughtery v. R. Gomez, et al
as 11-56311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHN DAUGHTERY
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GOMEZ, Mr., in his individual capacity and as Correctional Counselor I in his official capacity, BARBER, Lieutenant, in his individual capacity and as Correctional Lieutenant Unit One in his official capacity, B. A. SPEER, Mr., in his individual capacity and as Correctional Counselor II in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
