Cases 41 - 50 of 1,064
Pacheco v. Duncan et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Michael D. Duncan, Heather S. Warren, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Larry Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. Bullis et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Peter D. Huff
Defendant:
Brian Bullis, John Doe, FNU Biggerstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baca v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02043
Petitioner:
Damien Anthony Baca
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
England v. Oniya et al
as 5:2024ct03006
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David England
Defendant:
O. Oniya, D. Windley, J. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02001
Petitioner:
Webster Douglas Williams, III and Webster D. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avent v. Wind et al
as 5:2024ct03037
Plaintiff:
Antonio Santwan Avent
Defendant:
John E. Wind, David Bradley, Samuel D. Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
