Cases 41 - 50 of 468
Searles Jr v. Oakley
as 1:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
Leon D Searles Jr
Defendant:
Loren D Oakley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States Probation and Pretrial Services
as 3:2022cv05244
Petitioner:
Antoine D Johnson
Respondent:
United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Humphreys v. Cowlitz County Clerks et al
as 3:2022cv05240
Petitioner:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Respondent:
Cowlitz County Clerks, Cowlitz County Prosecutors, Ron Hains and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sawyer v. Botz et al
as 2:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Darryl Kevin Sawyer
Defendant:
Jami Botz, Steven Sager, John Doe Wittendale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States Probation and Pretrial Services
as 3:2022cv05163
Petitioner:
Antoine D Johnson
Respondent:
United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Echols et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dawnte Duane Jackson
Defendant:
D Echols, Richmond, Srgt Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States Probation and Pretrial Services
as 3:2021cv05812
Petitioner:
Antoine D Johnson and Antoine Douglass Johnson
Respondent:
United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gordon v. Inslee et al
as 3:2021cv05802
Plaintiff:
Ricky D Gordon and Deanna Lynn Gordon
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Cheryl Strange, Julie Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Anderson
as 4:2021cv05144
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Michael D Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Lewis
as 2:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Craig Barfield
Defendant:
Kenneth D Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
