Cases 41 - 50 of 531
Gilbert v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Wallace D. Gilbert
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Young
Defendant:
Warden D. L. Young, Warden Heckard, B. L. Fain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McNeal v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Cory D. McNeal
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boone v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Omarr D. Boone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morgan v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dairion E. Morgan
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Young, FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, Doctor Roger Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Syner v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
John D. Syner
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villarreal-Solis v. Roane
as 3:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Hugo Villarreal-Solis
Defendant:
Acting Warden D. Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Watkins v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00296
Petitioner:
John D. Watkins
Respondent:
Melissa Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Galbearth v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D. Galbearth
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
