Cases 41 - 50 of 22,228
Booker v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Karlos Marquett Booker
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Karas Correctional Health (KCH) et al
as 5:2024cv05117
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Karas Correctional Health (KCH), Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Paramedic Dustin Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Davis, Michael Hale, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Larry Daryl Collins
Defendant:
Joe Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ray v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Leslie Todd Ray
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. USA
as 1:2024cv01035
Petitioner:
Eddie Dean McBride
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Soard v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas Soard
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffin, McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
