Cases 51 - 60 of 931
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ishee et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Andre David Williams
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Ben Carver and Keven R. Chung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolon v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03227
Plaintiff:
Ardie D. Nolon and Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Roderick K. Watson and Timothy P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacheco v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Shelby Wyatt, Jonathan Call, FNU Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealey v. White et al
as 5:2023ct03215
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Nealey
Defendant:
Dr. David E. White, RN Scott, RN Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tudor v. Ishee
as 3:2023cv00435
Petitioner:
Travis Tudor
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03204
Plaintiff:
Greg H. Johnson
Defendant:
Sergeant Cooper, A. Threat, Officer Canon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Tilley et al
as 5:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
FNU Tilley, FNU Phillips, FNU Handy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Call et al
as 5:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
FNU Call, FNU Anderson and FNU Heus/Hues
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
