Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Taylor v. Sanders et al
as 1:2011cv01035
Plaintiff:
Peter Taylor
Defendant:
R. Sanders, B. Sudul, R. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. KLEM
as 2:2010cv03445
Petitioner:
REGINALD SANDERS
Respondent:
EDWARD KLEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders v. Rose et al
as 1:2010cv01241
Plaintiff:
Cyrus R Sanders
Defendant:
Emanuel Rose, Hewitt, Counselor "Jill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 1:2010cv01149
Petitioner:
Cyrus Robert Sanders
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Department of Corrections and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SLAUGHTER et al v. LAWRENCE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2010cv00450
Plaintiff:
KYRONE DAVIO SLAUGHTER, ROBERT W. DICK, FRANZ JAYNE and others
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY JAIL and BRIAN COVEAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. BELL et al
as 2:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
JORGE HARRIS
Defendant:
BELL, MARK BAKER, FELIPE A. ARIAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. BELL et al
as 2:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
JORGE HARRIS
Defendant:
BELL, MARK BAKER, FELIPE A. ARIAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv00111
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
STANLEY SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
