Cases 51 - 60 of 126
CASEY v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2017cv02485
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS and MELISSA BLALOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. Capentier et al
as 4:2017cv03462
Plaintiff:
Richard N. Tawe
Defendant:
Ray Capentier, Benito Cardoza, Jr., Kevin D. Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Akwitti et al
as 6:2017cv00276
Respondent:
Warden Chimdi A. Akwitti, Regional Office FNU Blalock, Officer Richard Harvey and others
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Adison Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell v. Director TDCJ et al
as 9:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Defendant:
Director TDCJ, Brenda O'Nail, Brenda Velleyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Davis et al
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta, III
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Director of TDCJ/STGMO, Responsible CRO (Classification Records Office) Official/s and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Haynes et al
as 9:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
T. Haynes, Billy Thompson, G Brandin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blalock v. Kelso et al
as 2:2017cv01813
Plaintiff:
Charles Blalock
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, M. E. Spearman, R. Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleck v. Livingston et al
as 2:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stephen Fleck
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rosie Norman, Denicia Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakouri v. Whitfield
as 4:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
Sharam Shakouri
Defendant:
Lori Davis , Kelli Ward , Melodee Blalock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross Nix v. McClarin, et al
as 17-40028
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROSS WAYNE NIX
Respondent - Appellee:
MCCLARIN, Warden, M BLALOCK and PANZY, Captain
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
