Cases 51 - 60 of 365
Anderson v. Dade Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv21899
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution, F-Dorm Security, Secretary, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dade Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2014cv01164
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution, F-Dorm Security, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Bell
as 8:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Ms. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hans Anderson v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-15330
Petitioner - Appellant:
HANS C. ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Anderson v. Officer Struder et al
as 8:2013cv02945
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Struder, Officer Kovaliski, Security One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Anderson
as 3:2013cv02722
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Davis
Defendant:
C. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnett v. Preston-Baecht et al
as 6:2013cv03341
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Lea Ann Preston-Baecht, Marty C. Anderson and Robert G. Sarrazin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnett v. Preston-Baecht et al
as 4:2013cv01716
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Lea Ann Preston-Baecht, Marty C. Anderson and Robert G. Sarrazin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnett a/k/a Delrossey v. Preston-Baecht et al
as 6:2013cv03336
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett a/k/a Delrossey
Defendant:
Lea Ann Preston-Baecht, Marty C. Anderson and Robert Sarrazin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. FNU Forestyer et al
as 8:2013cv01832
Plaintiff:
Hans C. Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Forestyer and FNU Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
