Cases 51 - 60 of 2,637
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer FNU Derry and FNU Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 4:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Officer FNU Derry, FNU Cates and Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alex Kenneth White v. B. Cates
as 2:2022cv09308
Petitioner:
Alex Kenneth White
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mario Ponce v. Brian Cates, et al
as 22-56168
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO VIDAL PONCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN CATES, Warden and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary CDCR
(PC) Smith v. Allison, et al.
as 1:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Christain Pfieffer, B. Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Triggs-Nunez v. Cates
as 2:2022cv02122
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Triggs-Nunez
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cates v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Austin Tyler Cates
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center, Col. Gibson, Officer Shumate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ray v. Cates, et al.
as 1:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Cates, Angel Ribera, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Allen v. Arias et al
as 1:2022cv01502
Plaintiff:
James D. Allen
Defendant:
Arias, Burgess, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Cates
as 3:2022cv07282
Petitioner:
Mychal A. Reed
Respondent:
Warden Bob Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
