Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Craig v. Boyd et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2010cv00667
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Rocardo Craig
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Ms. Seals and Tyrone Barrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Allen et al
as 3:2010cv02066
Petitioner:
Michael Craig Maxwell
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniel Craig
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Skipper v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2010cv00420
Plaintiff:
Craig Skipper
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Houston Co. Circuit Court and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00688
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Craig
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B. Clay, G. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Price et al
as 2:2010cv00160
Petitioner:
Charles Barnett Craig
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Craig v. Price et al
as 2:2010cv00151
Petitioner:
Charles Barnett Craig
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weston v. Hale et al
as 2:2009cv02563
Plaintiff:
Anthony Treymane Weston
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Craig, Hughes and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv02000
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEMITRI BROWN
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, LAPPIN, R. S. BALLASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skipper v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2009cv00870
Plaintiff:
Craig Skipper
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
