Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Locke v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv00499
Defendant:
Swisher, P. Luther, Dribelbis and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Locke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al
as 2:2019cv01063
Respondent:
PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al
as 5:2019cv01063
Respondent:
PA DOC Secretary, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
PARIS LAVAR GANTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gantz v. PA DOC Secretary et al
as 3:2019cv00232
Respondent:
John Wetzel, PA DOC Secretary and Mark Garman
Petitioner:
Paris Lavar Gantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ESTEP v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 3:2019cv00022
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARKE, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Petitioner:
SCOTT ESTEP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pollock v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) et al
as 1:2018cv01731
Plaintiff:
Michael Pollock
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC), Arif Shaikh, M.D., Stephanie Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snider v. McKeehan et al
as 4:2018cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
McKeehan, Nichtman, Jennifer Herrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEEKINS v. DOC's GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAZZ MEEKINS
Defendant:
DOC's GRATERFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOE, J. HAWK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
