Cases 51 - 60 of 183
DEPACK v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2019cv13513
Plaintiff:
ROY DEPACK
Defendant:
ALL SHAREHOLDERS OF ESSEX COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN GREEN, DR. ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SABETPOUR v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2019cv10030
Defendant:
DEBORAH MARTINEZ, CHARLES GREEN, OFFICER R. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
FARDAD SABETPOUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. Essex County Probation
as 1:2019cv10670
Petitioner:
Joanna M. Snyder
Respondent:
Essex County Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FACCHIANO v. COUNTY OF ESSEX, et al.
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FACCHIANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv15079
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
NORRIS BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEE v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2018cv14718
Defendant:
JESSICA YANETTE, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, SGT. W. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY H. LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. GREEN et al
as 2:2018cv14195
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and CHARLES L GREEN
Plaintiff:
TROY PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY et al
as 3:2018cv13304
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY
Petitioner:
CLIVE A. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WARD v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
as 2:2018cv03991
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC , STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROOKS v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
NORRIS BROOKS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
