Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Moyer v. Lebanon County et al
as 3:2016cv01424
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Moyer
Defendant:
Lebanon County, Jeffrey Yocum , A McHale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUNNINGHAM v. ZUBSIC et al
as 1:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
DONALD K. CUNNINGHAM, JR.
Defendant:
LISA ZUBSIC, HEATHER MCKEEL, NP-C and JAMIE FERDARKO, RNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, J.A. HORTON, D.F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
Angelo Lenell Davis
Defendant:
PA Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, Jan Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
RYAN BLACK
Defendant:
KIM SMITH and HEATHER G. MCKEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYO v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, PEGGY BAUGHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 2:2015cv01085
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JEREMY STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) et al
as 2:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA), SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTOPHER v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON
as 3:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
COREY L. CHRISTOPHER
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON, JOHN PREBISH, PRIMECARE MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. MCCULLAH et al
as 4:2014cv01853
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
JOHN MCCULLAH, MARK FLEMING, FRANSIS FASCIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
