Cases 51 - 60 of 340
Cisse v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Ali Cisse
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Gregory King, Martin Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Rochester Psychiatric Center et al
as 6:2022cv06057
Plaintiff:
Darius McCollum
Defendant:
Rochester Psychiatric Center, Jannette Wilson, Benita Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burrell v. Durkin et al
as 9:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Charlie Durkin, King, D. Lashway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Kings County DA et al
as 1:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lamar Brown
Defendant:
Kings County DA, City of New York, NYC DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Lippiccolo #6863 et al
as 2:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Lavon D. Dawson
Defendant:
Anthony Lippiccolo #6863, D.A. Melissa Turk, Suffolk County 6th Precicicnt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tamarez et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2021cv10678
Plaintiff:
Madelyn Tamarez and Pamela Buchbinder
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Bill De Blasio, Vincent Schiraldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Adamek et al
as 9:2021cv01320
Plaintiff:
Cameron King
Defendant:
Jason L. Adamek, Kenneth C. Shortt, David Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler et al v. Toulon et al
as 2:2021cv06745
Plaintiff:
Milo D. Tyler, Daniel Labbe, Warren King and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Errol Toulon, Warden Michael Franchi, County of Suffolk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Lamb et al
as 9:2021cv01263
Plaintiff:
Sharif King
Defendant:
R. Lamb and Chris Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Powhida
as 9:2021cv01253
Plaintiff:
Sharif King
Defendant:
Jeffrey M. Powhida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
