Cases 51 - 60 of 3,472
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Inmate Trust Fund
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David L. Shelton
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit, Warden Gene Miller, James M. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Akinode et al
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Dillard
Defendant:
Sergeants Oluyemi Akinode, Daniel B. Manyango, Obadina S. Omoaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Lane et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Darron Lane, Donald Muniz, Dwight L. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Monroe L. Davis
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hornsby v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Adam L. Hornsby
Defendant:
Brian Collier and Securus Mail Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
William L Arnett
Defendant:
Mike Griffith, Officer Doe #1, Guard Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Ernest Villa Marquez
Defendant:
Mike Griffs, L. Hodgking, Michael Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calderon v. Norsworthy et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Agustin Calderon
Respondent:
Christopher L. Norsworthy, Angela N. Chavelier, Hollis Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
