Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Lisa Council v. Margaret Bingham
as 10-60221
Petitioner - Appellant:
LISA HINTON COUNCIL
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BINGHAM
Sheffield v. Bingham et al
as 4:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Issac Sheffield
Defendant:
Margaret Bingham and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Jenkins
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Wexford Health Services, Gloria Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Bingham
as 5:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Clay, Jr.
Defendant:
Margaret Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Burke
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Margaret Bingham, Ernest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Morgan v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 09-60959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL GRAHAME MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and others
William Busick v. Margaret Bingham
as 09-60733
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM T BUSICK
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BINGHAM
Griffin v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00506
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Griffin
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Brian Ladner and Margaret Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00394
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jay Shelby
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Margaret Bingham and Brian Ladner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Taylor et al
as 3:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Johnny Crump
Defendant:
Michelle Taylor, Margaret Bingham, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
