Cases 51 - 60 of 196
PHILLIPS v. MERSHAN et al
as 1:2022cv02321
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MERSHAN, MARTIAL KNIESER and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILIPS v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv02181
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BOONE COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 1:2022cv02367
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP MICHEAL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BOONE COUNTY COURTHOUSE and CIRCUIT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv02182
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv02183
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAWYER v. NUTTER et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT SAWYER
Defendant:
OFFICER NUTTER, BROWN, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morman v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Roy Morman
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Jr, James Basinger, Jon Adam Ferguson and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. MEDLOCK et al
as 4:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
DAVID JASON TAYLOR
Defendant:
CODY MEDLOCK, FRANK LOOP, CAPTAIN FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00371
Petitioner:
Brandon A Phillips, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
